“People think that a liar gains a victory over his victim. What I’ve learned is that a lie is an act of self-abdication, because one surrenders one’s reality to the person to whom one lies, making that person one’s master, condemning oneself from then on to faking the sort of reality that person’s view requires to be faked…The man who lies to the world, is the world’s slave from then on…There are no white lies, there is only the blackest of destruction, and a white lie is the blackest of all.” ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
As of to date, Chong Ket Pen ran away with Protasco. That’s the only truth in the Protasco fiasco. Chong even name the company “I am Protasco”. Fireworks were planted to discredit his own saviours, Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee, in order to divert authority attention as well as blackmail their business while Chong continue to milk Protasco.
Panel 1
Tey Por Yee, Ooi Kock Aun – Charged using fake evidence? How it started?
New! Academic Documentary. Contributed and updated, C.K., December 2016.
” I truly believe that everything that we do and everyone that we meet is put in our path for a purpose. There are no accidents; we’re all teachers – if we’re willing to pay attention to the lessons we learn, trust our positive instincts and not be afraid to take risks or wait for some miracle to come knocking at our door. ” – Marla Gibbs
July 18, 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – The startup venture world was surprised a prolonged conspiracy of an investee manufactured a fake report to put blame and made an excuse to sue his own investors could be further manufactured with a legal charge, based on a false lawsuit using fake evidence. That part of the world is called Malaysia, a country with 30 million population and not less of controversial events.
On July 12, 2016, Tuesday, Malaysia news came up with a factory-produced cookie-cutter story “Ex-Protasco Bhd directors face another charge”. This time the allegation is jaw dropping – the investors cum victims (Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee of Protasco Bhd) of the investee (Chong Ket Pen of Protasco Bhd), were sued using material what market believed to be false and non existence. According to reliable sources, senior journalist in the know did a company search (on SSM) to find the truth if the allegation of their directorship were true, were shocked they couldn’t find any proof of such record as director or were there any wrong doing. Worst off, they found out the potential serious breach of duty by relevant officers who recommended and carried the suit. These leads are coming from some source of command, and believed linked to one Chong Ket Pen. Here is the news inserts with commentary that shocked the world.
” KUALA LUMPUR: Two former Protasco Bhd directors were charged yesterday with failing to disclose during a Board of Directors meeting on an oil and gas investment proposal that they had a direct interest in the matter. (Journalist found out that the allegation is based on Chong Ket Pen’s puppet allegation. Chong Ket Pen cowardly cover up the facts that he concealed the information where he secretly signed an agreement on 3rd November 2012 without informing his company board of directors, had triggered the motive to manufacture a blame to divert attention. That is real failure to disclose his interest during “his” board of directors meeting. Journalist surprised how come two victims which have never met the board during material time could be sued instead? Shouldn’t it be the other way round? Further more, this strange excuse of a failed execution by Chong Ket Pen in due diligence or failed to put an effort asking the right questions to vendor, were push as a blame to Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee. The victims whom Chong asked them to purchase the company Protasco Bhd and asked them to refer the oil deal, and they trusted Chong to carried out entire exercise, ends up become Chong’s scapegoat? Most outrageous is the ridiculous excuse of linking an ownership or relationship of the asset as basis of a lawsuit, where as the subject matter is the feasibility of the asset itself – Chong did the due diligence himself, unless he lied to himself, the asset past the test under his own hands. Who owns it is totally nothing to do with due diligence on the oil asset. According to relevant authority, if Chong Ket Pen failed the due diligence, Chong himself is to be blamed. He needs a scapegoat, conveniently his saviours becomes his victims to take the blame.)
In this regard, businessmen Datuk Tey Por Yee, 40, and Datuk Ooi Kock Aun, 49, are alleged to have unwittingly led the board members to approve acquisition of shares worth US$22 million (RM87.5 million) in PT Anglo Slavic Utama, a corporation in Indonesia, which they have ties with. (The authority personnel would be either blind sighted, or incompetence in pursuing justice by giving a public listed company board of directors such power abuse to manufacture and lie on board minutes. According to journalist material sources knowing the matters, Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee “never existed” nor “met the board” during the material time, how would Protasco Bhd board be remotely “dreamt” of them and led to approve an acquisition? Obviously the only person recklessly and urgently needs to led the board of Protasco Bhd for approval is the “one and only executive director” of Protasco Bhd during material time – Chong Ket Pen himself. This is the jaw dropping part – the obvious potential wrong doer is Chong Ket Pen, if the board of directors pretend to be “stupid”, shouldn’t there be board minutes to verify by Police Officers or Deputy Public Procecutor, levels and levels of verification to justify there is any basis for a charge? In that misery country, company may hire liars (or cowboy lawyers) to teach them how to lie. Maybe that explains.)
They are accused of committing the offence at Protasco Bhd, 2nd floor, Corporate Building Unipark Suria in Jalan Ikram-Uniten, Kajang here between November 2012 and Dec 28, 2012. (Anyone knowing the facts will fall off the chair with such statement in a legal charge, alleged the innocent victims Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee of committing an offence at a specific place which officers from Bursa Malaysia inteligence have no such record to show the existence of such event, unless again, manufactured by Chong Ket Pen and lied together with Protasco Bhd board of directors, acting in concert to “fabricate and lie on such event”. Once a lie starts and evidence manufactured, it’s lying all the way, makes no difference for them to fabricate more. Again, such facts were not verified. If did, it will proof no basis, and some how a legal suit took place as if the government officers are hypnotised by Chong of Protasco Bhd to jump off the cliff. Now that is serious national credibility crisis.)
The charge under Section 131(1) of the Companies Act 1965 punishable under Section 131(8) of the same Act, carries a maximum seven years imprisonment or RM150,000 fine or both, on conviction. (Here comes the main objective why Protasco Bhd fabricating a legal charge in order to discredit the victims Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee, so as to defame and cause damages to their business, in hope truth of unfaithful investee Chong Ket Pen be over shadowed by negative news and public impression. Curiously wasn’t Chong Ket Pen is supposed to be charged based on facts? Moreover, the entire board is acting in concert hand-knitting a story and led by Chong Ket Pen to take control of Protasco Bhd from the substantial shareholders Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee. This eventual event is apparent, despite any story telling by Chong Ket Pen and his board of directors.)
Ampang Sessions Court judge Azrul Darus set RM15,000 as bail with one surety for each of the accused, and Aug 26 for re-mention.
Prosecuting officer Mohd Zulkhairi Kamaruzaman from the Companies Commission of Malaysia conducted the prosecution while counsel Datuk Sukri Mohamed represented the two accused. — Bernama (Senior journalist tried to contact Mohd Zulkhairi Kamaruzaman to question him had he reviewed the board minutes, as well as the dates and records in Companies Commission Malaysia (SSM or CCM) to “verify the facts”, before such charge be secretly manufactured. In that part of the world, the process of legal system could be blind sighted, fabricated and controlled under a puppet master (or more precise “pay master”), even with obvious facts showing other wise, a charge could be manufactured. “Black and white record in SSM could be “skipped” and pretend didn’t existed and slip through the departure to form a legal charge. Thumbs up to the death of legal system.” commented a civil servant.)
The peculiar, jaw dropping, and mind blowing lies, as well as lost of humanity and manhood’s dignity of Chong Ket Pen and the Protasco Bhd board of directors acting in concert to cover up Chong Ket Pen wrong doing by scarifying Chong’s own investors, signals the death of credibility in that part of the world.
Study the Bursa Malaysia announcement would find clear evidence and motive of the suspected master mind Chong Ket Pen is the source causing series of unfortunate events surrounding his victims Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee. The saga started on June 2012 when Chong Ket Pen was removed from his power by Protasco Bhd former owner, replacing him with new directors such as See Ah Sing, Ibrahim Mohd Nor and few other directors. On November 2012, new shareholders Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee emerges, and the former owner left Protasco Bhd together with his directors. See Ah Sing being the most obvious, which sat as executive director for less than 5 months in Protasco Bhd. Chong Ket Pen was retained and repositioned to Protasco Bhd executive director post once again. Chong Ket Pen in fact becomes the one and only executive director to “propose, lead, and execute” anything, according to Bursa Malaysia announcement. It would be peculiar not to study this background, before any civil servant in the authorities to find the motive of the prime suspect of the conspiracy. In this case Protasco Bhd’s board of directors, led by Chong Ket Pen to buy himself back into power after being demoted; led by Chong Ket Pen to enter an oil deal, and further led by Chong Ket Pen to conduct due diligence; and later also led by Chong Ket Pen to manufacture evidence and find excuses to control Protasco Bhd after he is done using the investors Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee to ousted his former boss. If such incident were to occur in the West, Chong Ket Pen together with the board of directors from Protasco Bhd would have been prosecuted before even a charge could be fabricated to victimise Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee.
Newspaper in that country is also as good as blind cookie-cutters, write as per paid for. Whatever produced, just report as per pay masters. Don’t fall off the chair if you read another such conspiracy story took place in the land of Mystery.
Jessica. August 2016.
Panel 2
Protasco’s Guide to cheaters?
How to cheat your substantial shareholders and own a Company all by yourself? Ask Chong Ket Pen, and the Protasco Bhd board of directors, chaired by Hadenan Abdul Jalil. The magical civil servants turn “owners” in one of the potentially most corrupted government contract raiders in the country called Protasco is an open secret.
Recent news report have shown improvement in anti-corruption probe on government contract manipulators. This was conspired to be the main reason behind Chong Ket Pen which led his board of directors to fabricate lies after lies, in order for him to control Protasco Bhd. The evidence shown that Chong Ket Pen successfully gain control of Protasco Bhd is the “final objective and truth” – no matter what excuses Chong paints and lies.
“Clinton lied. A man might forget where he parks or where he lives, but he never forgets oral sex, no matter how bad it is.” ― Barbara Bush
Want to cheat your substantial shareholder or business partners? Learn from Chong Ket Pen. One needs to be a good liar, heart of a snake, and bowling size balls. Lie all the way, and believe in your own lies, so as to tell the lies again and again as if there is some truth in it. Learn from Chong Ket Pen. What is obvious, he controls Protasco Bhd after led the two investors Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee to fall into his plan, trusted him, led them paid for his freedom, and eventually put a blame and took control of their investments. That’s world class cheater role model.
” The secret of a successful liar? Cheat people who put trust in you, lie even to your mother and most importantly lying to yourself and believe in it” – Hadenan feat Chong.
Demo: Chief Liar Chong Ket Pen teaches Protasco Bhd chairman Hadenan Abdul Jalil the art of lies. “Keep lying!”
As of to date, Chong Ket Pen ran away with Protasco. That’s the only truth in the Protasco fiasco. Chong even name the company “I am Protasco”. Fireworks were planted to discredit his own saviours, Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee, in order to divert authority attention as well as blackmail their business while Chong continue to milk Protasco.
Ooi Kock Aun, Tey Por Yee - Victim Charged, culprit Walks. Welcome to Menace World of Liars - Borneostreet News 